Selling leads to healthcare providers is a growing strategy for agencies and referral networks. Whether you’re targeting clinics, dentists, or telemedicine providers, choosing the right pricing model ensures fairness, transparency, and profitability for both parties. Understanding different approaches allows agencies to align their offerings with provider expectations and generate recurring revenue.
Curious how your lead generation model compares to industry best practices? Get a free preview of your digital presence and see where your clinic or practice could improve lead acquisition.
Why Pricing Models Matter
- Fairness: Providers want to pay for quality, not just volume.
- Predictable revenue: Agencies benefit from recurring models or set pricing structures.
- Trust-building: Clear pricing prevents disputes and fosters long-term partnerships.
- Performance tracking: Pricing can be tied to measurable results, increasing accountability.
Common Pricing Models for Healthcare Leads
1. Cost Per Lead (CPL)
- Providers pay a fixed amount for each qualified lead.
- Example: UGX 10,000 per patient who fills out a complete appointment form.
- Best for: Clinics that want predictable per-lead costs and are capable of following up quickly.
- Pros: Transparent, easy to track.
- Cons: Agency assumes risk if leads don’t convert into appointments.
2. Tiered Pricing by Lead Quality
- Different lead types have different values:
- High-intent lead (ready to book) = higher price
- Informational inquiry (just seeking advice) = lower price
- Best for: Agencies selling mixed-quality leads.
- Pros: Fair pricing aligned with lead value.
- Cons: Requires clear definition of lead quality and consistent scoring.
3. Subscription-Based Leads
- Providers pay a recurring monthly fee for access to a set number of leads or lead credits.
- Example: UGX 500,000/month for 50 qualified leads.
- Best for: Clinics with predictable patient intake capacity.
- Pros: Recurring revenue for agencies, predictable budgeting for clinics.
- Cons: May discourage leads if volume exceeds demand.
4. Performance-Based Pricing
- Payment is tied to the outcome, such as booked appointments or completed consultations.
- Example: Pay 50% upfront for leads, 50% after a confirmed appointment.
- Best for: Agencies working with providers who want performance assurance.
- Pros: Aligns incentives between agency and clinic.
- Cons: Requires tracking and verification of conversions; may be administratively complex.
5. Hybrid Models
- Combines multiple approaches, e.g., base CPL plus bonus for high-converting leads.
- Best for: Agencies looking to balance risk and reward for both sides.
- Pros: Flexible and adaptable.
- Cons: Can be confusing if terms aren’t clearly defined.
Best Practices When Pricing Leads
- Define “qualified lead” clearly: Ensure both parties agree on criteria to avoid disputes.
- Provide transparency: Share lead source, submission date, and patient details where appropriate.
- Start with a trial package: Let providers test a small batch before committing to larger volumes.
- Monitor and optimise: Track lead performance and adjust pricing models as needed.
- Maintain legal compliance: Avoid sharing sensitive patient data improperly and follow healthcare privacy regulations.
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right pricing model for selling healthcare leads is critical for building trust and sustaining long-term partnerships. Whether you use cost-per-lead, tiered pricing, subscriptions, or performance-based structures, clear definitions, transparency, and monitoring ensure both agencies and providers benefit.
